Angela, Consent Language - I have uploaded the the KUMC data dictionary<https://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/attachment/ticket/208/PCORIALSREDCapSurvey_DataDictionary_2015-03-23.csv> to replace the existing one. Please note that it has KUMC language in it. (I am wondering if this will be more confusing with KUMC language.)
Marking identifiers - Good suggestion. I will try to make that change in the attached data dictionary Unable to see Participant Identifier button - This is correct for 6.4.4 when surveys are linked to records. I would suggest creating a test patient record and completing a survey to verify the process. Removing required option & Using survey access code - The instructions Laura Herbelin sent for generating letters for patients use survey links (and addresses) instead of survey codes. You might have to make corresponding changes in that process. Strange issue with Record ID - I could help but would prefer to look at the project (via GOTO meeting etc). Please let me know if you want me to look at the issues with you (or the project in general). Thanks. Regards, Adagarla, Bhargav Srinivas ________________________________ From: Bos, Angela [[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 10:20 AM To: Bhargav Adagarla; [email protected] Subject: ALS REDCap feedback Hi Bhargav, UTHSCSA is working to move our ALS REDCap project to production, but we have some issues to resolve. In the KUMC data dictionary<https://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/attachment/ticket/208/PCORIALSREDCapSurvey_DataDictionary_2015-03-23.csv>, the following fields were not marked as identifiers, so we set it to 'Y': mrn, who, consent_language (participant types own name in here). We removed the "required" flag for address/email fields, because we are using one or the other for specific participants, and we have not populated all the data for each of them. We also edited piping fields in the text of "Clinic Validation" instrument field "who" to match the variable names from the data dictionary. Was the [address] piped field here supposed to refer to mailing street address or email? This is shown at the top of the "Als Clinic Survey" instrument "CONSENT LANGUAGE CONSENT LANGUAGECONSENT LANGUAGECONSENT LANGUAGECONSENT LANGUAGECONSENT ..." The same instrument also says: "THIS IS A DRAFT VERSION. DO NOT ENTER REAL DATA." In our specific REDCap ( Version 6.4.4), we cannot enable the participant identifier option in the Participant List. The button to enable it does not exist on the Participant List page as it should. Our project is in development, so we should not require intervention by an administrator to do this, but we cannot find docs on how to enable the button to enable this. We plan to use survey_access_code instead of unique survey url. Therefore we will change the field on the "Survey Web Access" form and use it to store the data. Will this or any other changes we mentioned cause problems with later analysis of project data? We are also having a strange issue with our record ID field in REDCap. This field is usually the first field in the project, so by uploading the data dictionary record_id is used. However, when we load the online designer to verify the form, the username of the person who imported the data is shown in the record_id field, instead of real imported data. Looking at a record of test data, we see the record_id populated correctly, but the MRN field shows the REDCap user instead of the real value. (Looking at the field history here shows correct value and username for last edit). This one is really odd, and we might have to involve our RC administrator to resolve it. -Angela
_______________________________________________ Gpc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev
