#348: NAACCR Data Profile: How fresh is it?
---------------------------+--------------------------------
 Reporter:  bchrischilles  |       Owner:  bzschoche
     Type:  design-issue   |      Status:  closed
 Priority:  major          |   Milestone:  cohort-char-bc-db
Component:  data-sharing   |  Resolution:  fixed
 Keywords:  data-quality   |  Blocked By:
 Blocking:  297            |
---------------------------+--------------------------------
Changes (by dconnolly):

 * status:  assigned => closed
 * reporter:  dconnolly => bchrischilles
 * type:  enhancement => design-issue
 * resolution:   => fixed
 * blocking:   => 297


Old description:

> During the recent MU site visit, a researcher asked how far back our data
> goes. Russ explained that it varies from site to site and from system to
> system within sites.
>
> Russ answered on behalf of KUMC by way of a recent HERON release contents
> summary:
>
>  - [https://informatics.kumc.edu/work/blog/heron-calhoun-
> update#HERONCalhounContentsSummary HERON Calhoun Contents Summary]
>
> The code we use to generate the summary above is
>  - [https://informatics.kumc.edu/work/browser/heron_load/report_stats.sql
> report_stats.sql] which draws from `concepts_stats`, which is built in
>  -
> [https://informatics.kumc.edu/work/browser/heron_load/concept_stats.sql
> concept_stats.sql]
>
> Actually, the numbers from that code are only part of the story; we
> manually maintain info about when the various systems went live and when
> is our most recent snapshot.
>
> Let's integrate this sort of data profiling into our quarterly data
> quality review process. For bonus points, let's actually do breakdowns by
> year (or quarter or month).
>
> But perhaps that's a large goal that we should break down into parts. A
> smaller scoped task is something that I owe the breast cancer research
> team: info about how fresh tumor registry data is at each site.

New description:

 The breast cancer research team would like to know how fresh tumor
 registry data is at each site.

--

Comment:

 Let's scope this ticket to just the NAACCR freshness issue and track the
 rest as #359.

 We collected these data 1 Sep (ticket:12#comment:78):
  1. KUMC - July - monthly
  1. ''CMH - N/A''
  1. UIOWA - every two weeks
  1. WISC - July in production; Aug in QA; monthly
  1. MCW - July 30; working on an update ...
    Taylor writes: Our latest refresh was with data extracted on July 30th
 2015. We will be delayed on the next one, due to the migration of 3
 hospitals to one reporting system.
  1. MCRF - July; monthly
  1. UMN - July; quarterly
  1. UNMC - March; no regular update process yet
  1. UTHSCSA - registrar provides data monthly; integration into i2b2
 happens quarterly
  1. UTSW - diagnoses thru 2014; an update takes about a week
  1. MU - working on it (#344)

--
Ticket URL: 
<http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/348#comment:3>
gpc-informatics <http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/>
Greater Plains Network - Informatics
_______________________________________________
Gpc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev

Reply via email to