Sounds reasonable; no objections from MCRF. Thanks, Laurel
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Thomas Mish Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2015 8:14 AM To: Dan Connolly; <[email protected]> Subject: RE: OK to share babel ontologies with selected collaborators from NYC-CDRN, SCILHS CDRNs? No objections from WISC. -TM From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dan Connolly Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2015 3:46 PM To: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: OK to share babel ontologies with selected collaborators from NYC-CDRN, SCILHS CDRNs? We've discussed collaboration with SCILHS at length. Folks from the NYC-CDRN (Cornell, in particular) are using the HERON code and working through Tumor Registry integration. Access to share tables via babel's web-based SQL IDE would facilitate the collaboration. Our current agreement (#76<https://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/76>) is "share with GPC, not all of PCORI nor public ". Is it OK if we extend this to selected collaborators from other CDRNs, at the discretion of Russ, Nathan, and myself? -- Dan
_______________________________________________ Gpc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev
