Correct
On 2/2/16, 5:49 PM, "[email protected] on behalf of Chrischilles, Elizabeth A" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: >Can I assume that the MRN to study ID linkage has been retained for these >individuals so that this is available for the second and possibly other data >pulls? Thanks > >Betsy Chrischilles > >-----Original Message----- >From: GPC Informatics [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2016 10:34 AM >To: McDowell, Bradley D; [email protected] >Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; Chrischilles, Elizabeth A; >[email protected]; [email protected] >Subject: Re: [gpc-informatics] #453: missing mapping for one breast cancer >consented patient from MCW > >#453: missing mapping for one breast cancer consented patient from MCW >---------------------------+-------------------------------- > Reporter: brad_mcdowell | Owner: gkowalski > Type: problem | Status: new > Priority: major | Milestone: cohort-char-bc-db >Component: data-sharing | Resolution: > Keywords: data-quality | Blocked By: > Blocking: | >---------------------------+-------------------------------- > >Comment (by gkowalski): > > We went back to match the patients to their data and could not find one > patient. This matching was done by patient name and address. We had patients > that got married and changed their name and others that moved. > For these we found them , but in one instance a patient must have gotten > married and moved. Could not find them. In the future we will be storing > patient's MRN's per study for verifiable lookup later. > >-- >Ticket URL: ><http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/453#comment:1> >gpc-informatics <http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/> >Greater Plains Network - Informatics >_______________________________________________ >Gpc-dev mailing list >[email protected] >http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev _______________________________________________ Gpc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev
