The description says: "The missing 3 were excluded from our CDM build because they have since opted-out of having their data available for general research purposes."
Is that clear enough? -- Dan ________________________________________ From: Chrischilles, Elizabeth A [[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2016 9:33 AM To: [email protected]; Dan Connolly; McDowell, Bradley D Subject: RE: [gpc-informatics] #513: ~3% missing breast-cancer diagnosis data due to opt-out at UMN I'd like to understand the reasons for this. Is it because these consented patients were unable to be linked for some reason or is there some governance reason or something else. Thanks -----Original Message----- From: GPC Informatics [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, June 24, 2016 5:49 PM To: [email protected]; McDowell, Bradley D Cc: Chrischilles, Elizabeth A Subject: Re: [gpc-informatics] #513: ~3% missing breast-cancer diagnosis data due to opt-out at UMN #513: ~3% missing breast-cancer diagnosis data due to opt-out at UMN --------------------------+---------------------------- Reporter: dconnolly | Owner: brad_mcdowell Type: problem | Status: assigned Priority: major | Milestone: bc-dx-px Component: data-sharing | Resolution: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: 448 | --------------------------+---------------------------- Changes (by dconnolly): * owner: jdale => brad_mcdowell * status: new => assigned Comment: Brad, what would be the impact if UMN didn't manage to share diagnoses and procedures for 3 of their 98 consented patients? -- Ticket URL: <http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/513#comment:1> gpc-informatics <http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/> Greater Plains Network - Informatics _______________________________________________ Gpc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev
