We received feedback/questions from PCORI.  I have some questions for everyone 
regarding how refreshes/archiving should be done for it.

Here are the questions from PCORI:
1)We would like to understand more about your processes for refreshing your 
DataMart and creating a locked/static version of each DataMart refresh. Can you 
please describe your processes for us?  When you refresh your DataMart, do you 
perform a complete update or a partial update (e.g. updating new or changed 
information)?
2)Given the time necessary to refresh your data, what is the latest data that 
will be available in the DataMart relative to the date of query receipt? For 
example, if we send you a DC query on July 1, what is the date of the latest 
information you expect to be captured in the DataMart?

For UTSW,  I currently have the data in Oracle and we can do a complete update 
every month when we update our i2b2.  But, when we do so, it will wipe out and 
re-load all of the data.  What are others doing to create a “locked/static” 
version?  We’re also still creating our CDM from the de-identified, date 
shifted version of i2b2.  Are other GPC sites doing the same?  Or have you 
eliminated date shifting on the CDM?  I could fairly easily use our pre-shifted 
version of i2b2 but want to be consistent with other sites with regards to the 
process.  I’m also wondering if the date shifting may be causing our vitals 
data to look like it’s spiking around 1 year ago. I haven’t created a non-date 
shifted version to compare to through.

Thanks,
Phillip



From: 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> 
on behalf of Dan Connolly <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Monday, August 1, 2016 at 1:32 PM
To: "<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: gpc-dev 2 Aug agenda and meeting notes

What else for tomorrow?

  *   gpc-dev 2 Aug shared 
notes<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dHIQMVRWR8y6BpXoX3BPD8fGXL01hw9nrjVSrb76DLA/edit>;
 scribe: MU

________________________________


  1.  Convene, take roll, review records and plan next meeting

     *   ​Meeting ID and access code: 
817-393-381<https://global.gotomeeting.com/meeting/join/817393381>; call +1 
(571) 317-3131

     *   roll: all 
12DevTeams<https://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/wiki/DevTeams> 
represented? KUMC, CMH, UIOWA, WISC, MCW, MCRF, UMN, UNMC, UTHSCSA, UTSW, MU, IU
Reminder - put institution after your name in GoToMeeting preferences

        *   today's scribe: MU

     *   comments on the agenda? on last week’s notes 
(#12<https://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/12>)?
Recent tickets 
opened/closed<https://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/timeline> - FYI

        *   ...

        *   #520 (DataBuilder limited to one terms / concepts table) 
created<https://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/520> minor

        *   #409 (submit year 1 sustainability plan (milestone 2.7.1)) 
closed<https://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/409#comment:6>

     *   Next Meeting: 9 Aug - scribe?
Note LRU 
schedule<https://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/12#comment:92>, 
which nominates MCW, MCRF, …

  2.  Feasibility Query: National Diabetes Amputation Prevention    Study    
(NDAMPS)<http://listserv.kumc.edu/pipermail/gpc-dev/2016q3/003065.html>  Mei 
Liu: “Some learning points from the experience: …”

  3.  Milestone:tapir-trial-1
<https://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/milestone/tapir-trial-1>#521<https://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/521>identify
 providers in TAPIR 
trial<https://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/521>:  “KUMC is 
going first; MCW and UTSW to follow.”

  4.  Next-d geocoding
#508<https://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/508>Handling small 
geographic areas in geocoded data for 
Next-D<https://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/508> closed fixed:
“... using a non-derived/randomly generated id for the Geo-ID to link up the 
tables would satisfy safe harbor ...”

  5.  #402<https://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/402> enhanced 
data resource from GPC Cohort Characterization study with CMS data: “the 
[RESDac] project was approved”

     *   
CompleteData<https://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/wiki/CompleteData> 
-> GROUSE

  6.  #459<https://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/459>How to 
add GPC sites to SNOW SHRINE network?
<https://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/459>“In discussion of 
the health systems payor demonstration project, Russ learned that SCILHS is 
willing to host a SHRINE network for PCORNet.”

  7.  
Milestone:bc-dx-px<https://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/milestone/bc-dx-px>
 - #448 done! Yay!
How many hours of effort did it take? I have estimates from MCW, UMN.
I'd appreciate estimates from UIOWA, MCRF, WISC, UNMC, UTSW.

  8.  Milestone:cohort-char-bc-db
<https://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/milestone/cohort-char-bc-db>#358<https://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/358>NAACCR
 ETL: update all [8 participating] sites to include summary of treatment 
etc.<https://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/358>

     *   Participating sites

        *   KUMC - ETL done locally; need to update babel

        *   UIOWA

        *   WISC

        *   MCW

        *   MCRF

        *   UMN

        *   UNMC

        *   UTSW - full marks!

     *   Other sites

        *   CMH

        *   IU

        *   MU

        *   UTHSCSA

________________________________

--
Dan


________________________________

UT Southwestern


Medical Center



The future of medicine, today.

_______________________________________________
Gpc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev

Reply via email to