My two cents: My understanding is that sharing census tract ID with Northwestern would constitute the sharing of a limited dataset. The updated protocol already takes into account that we will be sharing a limited data set due to the request to include year and month for patient encounters.
To Phillip’s point, we have IRB approval for a limited data set (although the IRB does not explicitly call out the sharing of census tract id). Given that Northwestern has also executed the GPC External Collaborator Agreement which includes the GPC Use Agreement that covers the de-identified data AND limited data sets, it would seem that GPC sites are covered to share the census tract id. Perhaps I am interpreting this incorrectly? Dan Dan Hood | Health Information Project Manager Center for Biomedical Informatics [cid:[email protected]] 1101 West Tenth Street Indianapolis, Indiana 46202 Tel 317-274-9349 Twitter: @Regenstrief | Facebook.com/regenstriefinstitute www.regenstrief.org<http://www.regenstrief.org/> ___________________________________________________ Confidentiality Notice: The contents of this message and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential and/or privileged information and are intended solely for the use of the named addressee(s). Additionally, the information contained herein may have been disclosed to you from medical records with confidentiality protected by federal and state laws. Federal regulations and State laws prohibit you from making further disclosure of such information without the specific written consent of the person to whom the information pertains or as otherwise permitted by such regulations. A general authorization for the release of medical or other information is not sufficient for this purpose. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete the original message. Any retention, disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. From: Bernard Black [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 3:00 PM To: Mei Liu <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Dan Connelly <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Lindsey Cook <[email protected]>; Charon Gladfelter <[email protected]>; Brennan Connolly <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Hood, Daniel Robert <[email protected]>; Hillary Sandoval <[email protected]>; George Kowalski <[email protected]> Subject: RE: [gpc-informatics] #544: how to convert ACS raw variables to CAP variables (e.g. type of health insurance)? Mei: Yes, I think this is correct. That is why we offered both options: Option (i) is easier for you but involves trusting us to take the Census tract information and do *nothing* with it except add the geographic averages to an otherwise suitably limited dataset. Option (ii) involves you doing this yourself. Bernie ************************************************************* Bernard S. Black [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Nicholas D. Chabraja Professor, Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law Institute for Policy Research Kellogg School of Management, Finance Dep’t Law School: 375 East Chicago Ave., Chicago IL 60611 Kellogg: 2211 Campus Drive, Evanston IL 60208 tel: law: 312-503-2784; Kellogg: 847-491-5049; cell: 847-807-9599 papers on SSRN at: http://ssrn.com/author=16042 ************************************************************ -----Original Message----- From: Mei Liu [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 1:55 PM To: Bernard Black <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Dan Connelly <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Lindsey Cook <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Charon Gladfelter <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Brennan Connolly <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Hillary Sandoval <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; George Kowalski <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: RE: [gpc-informatics] #544: how to convert ACS raw variables to CAP variables (e.g. type of health insurance)? Based on my limited understanding, ACS variables linked to a census tract contain aggregate/average information. But the census tract ID itself when linked to a patient record is PHI because it identifies a geographic location with <20,000 people. Am I interpreting this correctly? Mei -----Original Message----- From: Bernard Black [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 1:09 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Dan Connolly; Mei Liu; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Lindsey Cook; Charon Gladfelter; Brennan Connolly; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Hillary Sandoval; George Kowalski Subject: RE: [gpc-informatics] #544: how to convert ACS raw variables to CAP variables (e.g. type of health insurance)? Census tract information *is* averaged, and is not PHI. That is why Census is willing to release it. Bernie ************************************************************* Bernard S. Black [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Nicholas D. Chabraja Professor, Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law Institute for Policy Research Kellogg School of Management, Finance Dep’t Law School: 375 East Chicago Ave., Chicago IL 60611 Kellogg: 2211 Campus Drive, Evanston IL 60208 tel: law: 312-503-2784; Kellogg: 847-491-5049; cell: 847-807-9599 papers on SSRN at: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ssrn.com_author-3D16042&d=DwIGaQ&c=yHlS04HhBraes5BQ9ueu5zKhE7rtNXt_d012z2PA6ws&r=UogPJ7VYoAeiC8NNwyY5AxLx8QgaRiMcicgAv7oi3tc&m=kMk6FMeGMKkvajhH3sNxHqinjmIAHAoKxcv6Fel-hbs&s=9pWzo8UHLCWNtjw0ZI9i1Nof20g2dgqoIOHg-yVhTRQ&e= ************************************************************ -----Original Message----- From: GPC Informatics [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 12:11 PM To: Dan Connelly <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Bernard Black <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Lindsey Cook <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Charon Gladfelter <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; George Kowalski <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [gpc-informatics] #544: how to convert ACS raw variables to CAP variables (e.g. type of health insurance)? #544: how to convert ACS raw variables to CAP variables (e.g. type of health insurance)? --------------------------+----------------------- Reporter: dconnolly | Owner: meiliu Type: design-issue | Status: assigned Priority: major | Milestone: next-d Component: data-stds | Resolution: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: 598 | --------------------------+----------------------- Comment (by meiliu): Our most recent IRB protocol is in the attachment. - As noted in the protocol, "...variables such as income, educational attainment, likelihood of employment, poverty status, owner-occupied house value, and health insurance coverage derived from geocoded address data will be used only as average values, not tied to any specific individual but rather to study populations." - I did not find any language on sharing census tract information. I've discussed this with Tamara McMahon and agree that since census tract may be PHI, we currently don't have the governance to take approach 1. Welcome any input from other sites. -- Ticket URL: <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__informatics.gpcnetwork.org_trac_Project_ticket_544-23comment-3A15&d=DwICaQ&c=yHlS04HhBraes5BQ9ueu5zKhE7rtNXt_d012z2PA6ws&r=CqPxCu-EywA2wo4iO-6BFqfwPQ2roHdsnjQi7SSLgLE&m=wjt2QT-caC0BaQoqA-1jzlQgfOhmfVhDcHV0oV9o_sA&s=SiG0BJXb-ag0DCYa_svdEDeEWNVOJVkGOkV0JtvXSAY&e=> gpc-informatics <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__informatics.gpcnetwork.org_&d=DwICaQ&c=yHlS04HhBraes5BQ9ueu5zKhE7rtNXt_d012z2PA6ws&r=CqPxCu-EywA2wo4iO-6BFqfwPQ2roHdsnjQi7SSLgLE&m=wjt2QT-caC0BaQoqA-1jzlQgfOhmfVhDcHV0oV9o_sA&s=Mpnaed_RgiVlMRfvyIbhydJzr6UR3yEq9-l7Cbir8co&e=> Greater Plains Network - Informatics
_______________________________________________ Gpc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev
