Thanks Laura. Great to hear Russ Waitman
> On Aug 1, 2017, at 11:27 AM, Manuel, Laura S M <[email protected]> wrote: > > San Antonio submitted at 2:30pm yesterday(7/31) we are still waiting to hear > back from PCORI. They were probably overwhelmed by all of the people > submitting on the due date. > ________________________________________ > From: Gpc-dev [[email protected]] on behalf of > [email protected] [[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2017 11:13 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Gpc-dev Digest, Vol 42, Issue 2 > > Send Gpc-dev mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Gpc-dev digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. gpc-dev 1 Aug: cancel in 3... 2... 1... (Dan Connolly) > 2. Re: [gpc-informatics] #579: Data Characterization - Cycle 3 > Tracking (GPC Informatics) > 3. RE: gpc-dev 1 Aug: cancel in 3... 2... 1... (Russ Waitman) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 15:11:59 +0000 > From: Dan Connolly <[email protected]> > To: "," <[email protected]> > Subject: gpc-dev 1 Aug: cancel in 3... 2... 1... > Message-ID: > <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > I haven't managed to get an agenda together. Is there anything sufficiently > important to discuss today that I shouldn't cancel? > > > -- > Dan > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <http://listserv.kumc.edu/pipermail/gpc-dev/attachments/20170801/eec255b3/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 16:09:14 +0000 > From: "GPC Informatics" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected], [email protected], > [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], > [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [gpc-informatics] #579: Data Characterization - Cycle 3 > Tracking > Message-ID: > > <0100015d9e8ef03d-b96038aa-08f8-4822-acc9-26364da54e54-000...@email.amazonses.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > #579: Data Characterization - Cycle 3 Tracking > ------------------------------+------------------------- > Reporter: lv | Owner: mprittie > Type: task | Status: assigned > Priority: major | Milestone: cdm-cycle3 > Component: data-stds | Resolution: > Keywords: CDM v3, DCQ, EDC | Blocked By: > Blocking: | > ------------------------------+------------------------- > > Comment (by rwaitman): > > Iowa and Indiana approved on 8/1. > > UTSW had a very simple issue of not specifying 3.1 in the Harvest Table. > Phillip was rerunning on the 31st and plans to submit today. Russ > suggested he let DRN OC know. > > Todd says Mizzou submitted at 7pm on 7/31 and shared info with Cerner/CMH > colleagues on a replication issue to make the submission go through. That > hopefully meant CMH could also submit yesterday. Gary Gasperino at Cerner > typically does it for CMH. > > Also need to know status from San Antonio. > > -- > Ticket URL: > <http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/579#comment:15> > gpc-informatics <http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/> > Greater Plains Network - Informatics > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 16:13:17 +0000 > From: Russ Waitman <[email protected]> > To: Dan Connolly <[email protected]> > Cc: "PCORnet DRN OC \([email protected]\)" <[email protected]>, > "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "Mark Hoffman > PhD \([email protected]\) \([email protected]\)" <[email protected]> > Subject: RE: gpc-dev 1 Aug: cancel in 3... 2... 1... > Message-ID: > <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Had a brief chat with Todd, Brian and Jim. Looks like we're in better shape > on the CDM refresh this cycle. See my notes o > http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/579#comment:15 > > Mizzou went in late last night. UTSW had that small bug of 3.0 instead of > 3.1 mentioned in the harvest table and Phillip is fixing now to submit today. > > Will just need to confirm status with CMH and San Antonio. > > - CMH Cerner team should have received the replication issue info in > time to submit last night. > > - I think the regulatory hurdles in San Antonio were overcome but > not sure on the timing for the actual CDM work. > > Russ > > From: Gpc-dev [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dan > Connolly > Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2017 10:12 AM > To: , > Subject: gpc-dev 1 Aug: cancel in 3... 2... 1... > > I haven't managed to get an agenda together. Is there anything sufficiently > important to discuss today that I shouldn't cancel? > > > -- > Dan > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <http://listserv.kumc.edu/pipermail/gpc-dev/attachments/20170801/809e8b2a/attachment.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > _______________________________________________ > Gpc-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev > > > ------------------------------ > > End of Gpc-dev Digest, Vol 42, Issue 2 > ************************************** > _______________________________________________ > Gpc-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev _______________________________________________ Gpc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev
