Laurel, Marshfield folks, what are the odds you can get these addressed by the Oct 16 refresh?
-- Dan ________________________________ From: Gpc-dev [[email protected]] on behalf of Russ Waitman [[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2017 1:13 PM To: [email protected] Cc: Darcy Louzao, Ph.D.; Lesley Curtis; Laura Qualls Subject: FW: GPC c003, Initial Refresh Feedback Hi DRNOC, Thanks for sharing. I think it may be a short turn around to get much fixed in less than a month but sharing to see what’s possible. Hi GPC Dev, Just got info on further EDC analysis from Duke. Dan: can we queue up for a GPC-DEV call in the future? Russ From: PCORnet DRN OC [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2017 12:19 PM To: Russ Waitman Cc: Lesley Curtis; Darcy Louzao, Ph.D.; Laura Qualls Subject: GPC c003, Initial Refresh Feedback Good afternoon, As part of our recent Data Curation Review Process, we spent time reviewing the data across numerous areas. This was not meant to be an in-depth review of every single DataMart, but in some cases, we found items which were either not part of the EDC report or part of the EDC report but not fully reported. While not comprehensive, the attached supplemental items were flagged for DataMarts in your CDRN and could benefit from investigation. We recommend investigating these items to determine if they are remediable or an accurate reflection of source data. If an item is remediable, please address it as soon as possible. If it is not feasible to incorporate changes in the upcoming refresh (due October 16th), items may be remediated in an off-cycle refresh or in Cycle 4 (January 2018). If you have any questions or comments regarding these observations or would like to request an off-cycle refresh please contact us at [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>. Thanks, The Data Curation Team
_______________________________________________ Gpc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev
