[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >amen to that. If you're ever bored David, there's still plenty of >work over at gnumed. ;-) > > Thanks Ian. The good thing about pitifil for me was that it was a project that I could get my head around and it did not matter if I broke anything. (It also scratched a particular itch I had.)
It took a while to make my first faltering steps in python but once you get the swing of it you can get productive pretty rapidly. >>On 20/11/2005, at 4:50 PM, David Guest wrote: >> >> >>>Medical Director 2 currently locks up with big pit files (? ~ 60k). To >>>clear the lock you will need to crash out and then go into >>>C:\MDW2\Processing on the local machine and delete the offending pit >>>file. Most scanned RTF files are less than 10k however. >>> >>> >I'm fascinated that your OCR is accurate enough to match patient names. >What OCR package are you using? > Omnipage Pro version 15. I don't know if the recent upgrade made any difference. As mentioned previously we scan to simple RTF Windows 97 version. That seemed to work pretty well. I had a go at Kooka using the OCRAD and gocr OCR engines last week on my debian machine. My output on some faxed TIFFs was very dismal. It was not a fair comparison compared to clean scanned images on the Windows box but open source OCR still has a fair way to go before catching the commercials. David -- "UFW. Deb does linux."
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
