On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 07:35, David Guest wrote: > She was also concerned that her paper letters that we scan into our > system contained errors. It is true. Scanning accuracy is still only > about 99%. I did promise her however that if she emailed them to me they > would be 100% accurate. no, it wouldn't be, because they are always full of errors made by the typist. The lady whose prostate is normal; all those fun typos reported in the press... and we have to use our brains to get past those letters signed without being proof read now, so we can still manage with an occasional error thanks to scanning. Liz
-- Not valid with other offers or specials. _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
