Ian Cheong wrote:
Did this problem come from poor governance - poor decision-making
processes in the "co-operative". The rules of operation should never
have permitted such behaviour. When one out of 8 can hold the rest to
ransom, that's not democracy or consensus. Sounds like blackmail.
Ian,
I suspect that when the co-operative was formed electronic records were
nowhere in sight, so no 'rules' about this sort of thing were ever
considered. Further, I suspect that because all the doctors own a share
of the business it becomes difficult to force anything on anyone, unless
it was agreed at the outset.
The other issue is that adoption has grown slowly, with the interested
majority using the system, and the minority diminishing to just one over
time.
Or maybe they are just being compassionate human beings and don't want
to be seen to be ganging up on him.
Greg
--
Greg Twyford
Information Management & Technology Program Officer
Canterbury Division of General Practice
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ph.: 02 9787 9033
Fax: 02 9787 9200
PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
***********************************************************************
The information contained in this e-mail and their attached files,
including replies and forwarded copies, are confidential and intended
solely for the addressee(s) and may be legally privileged or prohibited
from disclosure and unauthorised use. If you are not the intended
recipient, any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure,
modification, distribution and/or publication or any action taken or
omitted to be taken in reliance upon this message or its attachments is
prohibited.
All liability for viruses is excluded to the fullest extent permitted by
law.
***********************************************************************
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
