Ok i have to ask the obvious question... Why did you not jump up to PS2 ?????
Even as a temporary measure till you found something else ? 1.64 was a complete nightmare.(made a lot of new customers for Totalcare on G.Coast) 2.* was a tiny bit more stable 3.* a little bit better still. Andrew C > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Elizabeth Dodd > Sent: Tuesday, 29 November 2005 2:30 PM > To: General Practice Computing Group Talk > Subject: [GPCG_TALK] Pracsoft1.64b database corruption > > > > > > So, it's happened again, another complete pracsoft washout > with the access database corrupted and unusable. > I've saved a copy of the broken database in case we can use > it for something. > Maybe we could test database repair tools on it? > We are sitting on an idea in which we archive Pracsoft at the > end of the financial year, using that just to finish off the > receipting for a couple of months. > We'll copy useful tables from the old Pracsoft into a new > database (like the > demographics) and then have a fresh financial database > without the huge size which kills performance. > Is this feasible? > Am I right in thinking that I need a copy of Access 97 to do this? > > > liz > > who will talk to the guy at alerce.com.au again about his > mysql system. > _______________________________________________ > Gpcg_talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
