Hello David, Yes sure. we also now have our SOAP interface up and going. I am running on it today.
http://203.44.75.20:2000/SOAP/?WSDL gives you the spec. Its a clone of our HL7 based interface so we know it works from a functional point of view. I want to include that in capricorn, which is a simple matter of a define, once its tested. Andrew Monday, December 12, 2005, 1:18:15 PM, you wrote: DG> Andrew DG> Can I reply to this on the public mailing lists, keyserver and/or ozdocit? DG> It seems like we are getting down to the pointy end of things. DG> David >>-------- Original Message -------- >>Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 09:54:25 +1100 >>From: David Guest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> >> >>Hi David, >> >>I saw a copy of a post you sent to ?Keyserver list. >> >>I few corrections if I may: >> >>The specialist side is much more tightly integrated with Word and has >>lots more options. The GP client is artificially tied to PKI keys, which >>is a big hassle for us because of driver problems. PKI is not as smooth >>as it should be.... >> >> >>We also have native HL7 clients that are tightly HL7 bound. Have a look >>at the presentations on our web site, they are the most informative >>documents. >> >> >>GNUPG requires GNUPG on the machine and in the path. We haven't really >>used it much in magellan, so not even sure I put a config page in. >> >> >>Our servers are at Pipe Networks in Brisbane, 300mb of connectivity. >> >>We are not "proprietary" - we have an open interface and its all HL7, in >>fact we are the only Australian Organisation with AHML HL7 >>certification. The interface is published and open and we have developed >>a client, which I mentioned to you last night, that would allow anyone >>to run an interface. >> >> >>So yes we have to charge someone, or we will not survive to continue to >>do more R&D, but we have an open interface and a distributed >>architecture and as you have seen support Email that is argus and >>Thunderbird compatible. I am not sure how much more we can do to satisfy >>peoples concerns. I am sure we could never satisfy John Dooley who wants >>it all free - not sure who runs it. However by having an open interface >>others can write applications that can be run over the interface so the >>threat of lock in is less. We do however know how much work it took us >>to get where we are so there is some safety in that ;-) >> >> >>To criticize us as Propriety is quite unfair, we may be the only ones >>that can do it now, but its playing into the corporate ie Healthlink's >>hands to group us with them. We are busy getting to corporate pathology >>defectors setup with systems that exceed the capability of the big >>corporate Path labs, but I fail to understand resistance to a system >>with open interfaces the runs with Australian standard message >>formats????? No its never going to be free for everyone to use, but if >>you can put up your own interface then we will send to it and so can >>anyone else who can write the software that's capable of doing it. >> >> >>I don't think thats "lock in" >> >> >>BTW - We are on the same page as health link here :-) >> >>DG> Attached is a link to the new GP Connect web page: >>http://www.health.qld.gov.au/qhpss/gpconnect.asp >> >> >>Andrew McIntyre >> >> >> DG> _______________________________________________ DG> Gpcg_talk mailing list DG> [email protected] DG> http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk -- Best regards, Andrew mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrew McIntyre Buderim Gastroenterology Centre www.buderimgastro.com.au PH: 07 54455055 FAX: 54455047 _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
