Peter,

try running something like McAfee Spamkiller before your mail program eg Outlook.

that way you can kill them before "accepting" them.
This will stop giving away you have a valid email address for them to pass around ie onsell.

You can then set filters to block future traffic from those sources.

This way you also remove the need to download the spam and can kill it at the ISP.

That should slow it down
also get your ISP/mailserver to automatically reject all emails sent to addresses that are not valid.
        you might lose a few you want but anybody sending good mail to you should know your address anyway.
        It will blow away all blanket spam emails though.

Mark Evans

e-Health Development Officer

SA Divisions of General Practice Inc

First Floor, 66 Greenhill Road

WAYVILLE  SA  5034

Telephone (08) 8271 8988 Fax (08) 8271 8344

Mobile 0408 828 585

Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Visit our website at www.sadi.org.au
 
This e-mail may contain confidential information, which also may be legally privileged. Only the intended recipient(s) may access, use, distribute or copy this e-mail. If this e-mail is received in error, please inform the sender by return e-mail and delete the original.
If there are any doubts about the validity of this message, please contact the sender be telephone.
It is the recipient's responsibility to check the e-mail and any attached files for viruses. 




-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Peter Machell
Sent: Friday, 30 December 2005 9:59 PM
To: General Practice Computing Group Talk
Subject: Re: [GPCG_TALK] Spam, spam, spam, spam. Spam, spam, spam, spam.



On 30/12/2005, at 2:53 PM, David Guest wrote:

> Dear OzDocers
>
> As the admin for our surgery network I get copies of the filtered 
> spams,
> bounced messages, viruses etc. It's now getting upwards of 2000 mails
> per day. It's no problem deleting them but I am starting to wonder 
> about
> bandwidth usage.
>
> The options seems to be coarse grained ISP filtering or changing our
> domain name. The latter seems the more appealing to me but the name is
> stuck on things like stationery that will hang around for months to 
> years.
>
> What are others doing?

When you are the MX for the domain you have no choice but to accept 
at least the headers.

Good header checking, with manually added rules in the case of an 
outbreak, should reject at least half of all spam and virus infected 
email. Pass the rest (excepting your optional whitelist) to 
Spamassassin or similar, then onto a trained spam filter on the email 
client.

Not a lot gets through that.

Be careful with RBLs - there are many falsely accused and they don't 
stop new spam.

Peter.
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

Reply via email to