Can someone remind me of the name of the software for billing that was
discussed on the nat-div group a couple of months ago. I understand it
runs on linux and has HIC online and everything working well.
It won't be open source, but for a financial business purpose, I don't
think that is the same issue as when we think about clincal software.
Richard Hosking wrote:
Terrific idea
I reckon the cost of M$ and related infrastructure gives someone an
opportunity. (At least some of) The gap is available as revenue.
I would get involved myself if I had the time and expertise and didnt
have to keep on the treadmill for school fees/wife spending etc.
Gnumed looks like a possibility, but still lacks a credible front
desk/financial package/prescribing module, all of which are really
mandatory for an Australian system
R
john hilton wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 19:07, Ian Haywood wrote:
There's probably only 4-5 GP practices in the country where somebody
cares
about open-source. Nobody's going to go bust by ignoring this market.
What if:
-There were products available (clinical, accounting, messaging) that
ran on linux. -There were clinical products available that ran on
open source database
-These were available, packaged with easy distros, such as mepis.
-the cost savings of the OS/office/database/antivirus was calculated
to completely offset the it support and medical practice system costs.
could a market "appear" ?
jh
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
