Ian Haywood wrote: >Basically an EHR project which focusses on Australian requirements, and in its >design keeps >itself within the meagre intellectual capacities of the programmers. >I hope to have something to show at 1280cc. > >For others to help we first need to lock down and document not so much the >external requirements, but the >internal ones: database design policy, middleware and how data moves around, >and GUI design policy, >so different people can write compatible modules. >It was the inability to make these decisions that paralysed gnumed for so >long. (and we >finally ended up with a (personally) rather daunting 'neither-fish-nor-fowl' >solution) > >This technical decisionmaking is what I tried to get started on the >ozdocit.org wiki, but we have heaps of wildly different >solutions with no clear way of choosing a single one. Also, many people are >indifferent to the >amount of programmatic work their favourite solution represents. Richard and I >are doing what we *can* >do, which certainly isn't the best solution, but IMHO would still be better >than most of the commerical offerings >(mainly because we are like two little gnomes standing on the PostgreSQL >giant's head) > > Ian
I was not aware of your wiki efforts and stumbled across them earlier this week. I note your previous requests for a more detailed specification, which I perhaps too lightly dismissed. If we can gather sufficient resources for a serious attempt at a doable gmII, I would be more than happy to help. David _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
