You are right, of course. But I dont think that Bill Gates was public enemy number one then. We have to try to balance things.
My point was that he (BG) inflames so much passion in so many people that it is unhealthy to think that he is ALL bad. He does even have some altruistic attributes and is supporting malaria research in Australia at the present time. God never opens one door but he closes another. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Churches Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 4:24 PM To: General Practice Computing Group Talk Subject: Godwin's Law (was Re: [GPCG_TALK] Details of Public Coag Outcome) David de Bhál wrote: > Well we had this great security audit and did not have too many problems. > > You have chosen, unlike 95%+ of the rest of the world, to exclude yourself > from some marvelous software - you will be the loser. > > It smacks back to the totalitarian attitudes that one person is right > despite the market. They tried to kill off the Jews in the 30s because they > thought they were superior, we now have another mob killing others because > they are right and the majority is wrong about what they can or cannot do > and watch. I think it is appropriate to invoke Godwin's Law at this point. Those unfamiliar with it should see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law Tim C _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
