-----Original Message-----
From: Kristen Connell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 17 February 2006 4:15 PM

Please find attached this week's GP Network News. This edition looks at 
checking patient eligibility for MBS items, COAG and RACGP Research Grants. 

http://www.ama.com.au/web.nsf/doc/WEEN-6M48F5 

"AMA GP Network News
Issue 06, Number 3 - 17 February 2006
Item eligibility checking
More and more MBS items are being introduced that have time limitations 
attached, such as the patient can only
access this service once a year. The new chronic disease management items are 
the perfect example of this new
trend. There are also a growing number of health assessment items that operate 
in a similar manner.
When the new chronic disease items were first discussed with Government, the 
AMA made it very clear that the strict
time limitation rules made it vital doctors be able to check patient 
eligibility. It explained that this was necessary to
prevent situations where the doctor completes the comprehensive and time 
consuming work related to creating a
care plan only to discover the patient already had a care plan prepared by 
another GP. The Government agreed to
make patient eligibility checking possible through a hotline (GPNN 11 June 
2004).
However, because of privacy issues this hotline never eventuated. According to 
the Government, privacy rules mean
no information about a patient's item claiming history can be provided to 
anyone but the patient. That means that the
only person who can check whether a patient is eligible for an item is the 
patient. The patient can check their
eligibility while in the presence of the doctor or his staff.
This situation is obviously inadequate as many patients do not know whether 
they have had a care plan previously
and do not understand the MBS system fully enough to ring and check which items 
they have already accessed. For
a doctor to ask a patient to check before providing a service would potentially 
impact on their relationship.
The only effective way these new items can operate is for practices to be able 
to check patient eligibility. The AMA
will be writing to the Government calling on them to revisit this decision. 
Until patient eligibility can be properly
verified, the AMA will continue to argue against doctors being penalised for 
providing services in good faith."


In our Pracsoft v3.4 with Online Claiming, we can do an 'OPV' check - our 
computer asks the Medicare computer to confirm that we have the correct 
Medicare number, name, address, etc. for the patient.  The purpose of the OPV 
check is prevent the claim from being rejected because the details that we have 
don't match those held by Medicare.

It would be good to have a similar function (perhaps called an Item Eligibility 
Check) for item numbers that we are proposing to bill.  Our computer would ask 
the Medicare computer "What about if we billed item 900?" (for example).  If 
the patient has had the item billed within the interval specified for that item 
(is it one year for item 900?),  the Medicare computer would say, just like in 
the bank sketch in Little Britain: "The computer says noooo". 

Of course, since most EPC items are bulk billed, one *could* just actually 
transmit the claim for the item 900 or whatever item it is, *before* providing 
the service, to find out whether the claim will be rejected.  The only teeny 
weeny possible difficulty with doing this is that it is just the tiniest bit 
illegal to bill for the service before providing it.  Remember, you didn't hear 
this from me.


Oliver Frank, general practitioner 
255 North East Road, Hampstead Gardens 
South Australia 5086 
Ph. 08 8261 1355  Fax 08 8266 5149 
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

Reply via email to