Nice solution but may not meet the needs of the radiology industry or
patients. 

Many mistakes are made when our patients ring for appointments and errors of
communication lead to incorrect tests being scheduled or lack of appropriate
preparation. The solution is having the request available at the time of
booking.

This has to be sorted when the patient presents (bad luck if they have come
50km for a test and find there is a problem with the logistics.)

We have been looking at these issues in a consultancy done by a health
informatics team for the College.

Einstein said something like:  "make it simple but not more simple than it
can be"








-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Dr Hugh Nelson
Sent: Wednesday, 15 March 2006 2:01 PM
To: General Practice Computing Group Talk
Subject: Re: [GPCG_TALK] Increase in radiology ordering

same solution as for electrifying prescriptions.
just get the imaging providers to agree on some standards.
print the demographics and the test report in a bar code as well as in plain
text.
then the radiology practice can zap the request in with a supermarket
scanner

this means the patient retains the paperwork and securely transmits it to
the radiology practice and it is machine readable
problem solved.

john dooley wrote: 

        Richard Hosking wrote:
          

                AS I have said before - look at the workflow.
                The patient is the messenger of the request - why send it
separately via
                E mail?
                If it arrives separately, the radiology practice now has to
worry
                whether the pt will turn up.
                They have the address and contact details on the form -
indeed the forms
                are DESIGNED to be used this way.
                
                R
                
                    

        R
        
        The point of the electronic request for the xray company is the data
        entry girls dont have to enter it when the patient fronts....big big
big
        savings (data entry is basically expensive) same as path and also
big
        improvement in reducing errors on data entry...on the downside as
has
        been pointed out is what to do with the % of no shows clogging the
        databases...and more importantly what medicolegal obligations does
that
        raise...re followup of noshows...
        
        
        oh if only people would accept responsibility for their own actions
the
        world would be a better place.. ;)
        
        JD
        _______________________________________________
        Gpcg_talk mailing list
        [email protected]
        http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
          




_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

Reply via email to