There are an incredible number of GPs who cannot even take a blood pressure,
judging by my experience. I would suggest that 90% of medical personnel do not
know even the very basics of taking a blood pressure.

I hope it will not be too long before the process is automated taking the
subjectivity out of the measurement of this.





Quoting Alexander Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

>
>
> On 16/04/2006, at 12:01 PM, Ian Haywood wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Oliver Frank wrote:
> >
> >> are probably intended by their funders to provide mainly secondary
> >> care,
> >> do also provide primary care by allowing anybody to walk in to their
> >> emergency departments and be seen for problems that could have been
> >> treated often better and usually much more cheaply in primary care
> >> settings such as general practice.
> > No,
> >
> > The funders (especially the Feds) insist, by legislation, that any
> > H. sapiens who
> > presents at an ED must be seen by a doctor, no matter how trivial
> > Triage nurses can triage, but
> > cannot send a patient away, ever. The hospitals would love to
> > change this rule.
> >
> > Generally the numbers of ED presentations who really could be
> > managed in [urban] GP is barely 10%
>
>
> Having worked substantially in both Emergency and General Practice in
> recent years, I would say that the figure of 10% of patients
> presenting to Emergency Departments being able to be managed in
> General Practice is very low and incorrect. It may reflect a view of
> Emergency Medical staff that general practitioners are incapable of
> more than taking a blood pressure and writing repeat prescriptions
> for medication prescribed by specialists but that is in fact not the
> case. General practitioners would generally be able to manage all the
> category 4 and 5 patients more efficiently and more cheaply if only
> they were properly resourced to do it. I would say the figure is more
> like 30-50% of patients presenting to emergency departments could be
> managed more effectively in general practice but recognition of this
> would have some negative impact on the funding applications by
> emergency departments; this would be an unfortunate circumstance as
> emergency departments are also under-resourced for the job they are
> being asked to do.
>
> In rural practice of course, it is often the same doctor seeing the
> patient in the local emergency department and in a reasonably
> equipped surgery where the delivery of care to category 4 and 5
> patients would be essentially identical.
>
>
>
> > Usually these people never get into a cubicle and are seen quickly
> > by the intern/junior resident,
>
> My experience of working and teaching in emergency departments is
> that one of the striking differences between junior and senior
> doctors is the speed with which they assess and manage patients. I
> have seen junior doctors tied up for hours with category 4 and 5
> patients.
>
> > so cheaper is very debatable (viz. the hourly rate of an intern in
> > Vic is $21, less than a cat B consult)
>
> plus the triage nurse, the nurse aid, the clerk etc - overheads in
> the emergency department which quickly inflate the cost compared to
> barebones general practice.
>
> > they are not a big issue in EDs, in particular are not a source of
> > overcrowding.
>
> Patients presenting to a nearby emergency department with urgent
> problems such as earache in a child who have to wait 5-8 hours to be
> seen would not necessarily agree that such patients are not a source
> of overcrowding.
>
> > Most present after-hours when (in fairness to the patient) GPs are
> > not available,
>
> because there is no funding for GP after-hours clinics.
> >
> > However, the primary care so provided is dis-continuous and
> > generally crap: that's the big issue IMHO.
>
> Occasionally the care is excellent with good referral back to general
> practice but that is the exception unfortunately.
>
> Alex
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gpcg_talk mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
>




----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

Reply via email to