G'day Hugh

The CBT is organised as a series of 6 - 12 appointments, each of 40 minutes duration but allowing 45 minutes - this allows time for writing notes or bringing a session to a close with any tasks I may have for the patient for the intervening week. I charge the "Focussed Psychological Strategies" extended attendance fee (Item 2725) plus a gap fee of $45. The gap fee is payable at the time of booking, is not refundable, and reduces the no-shows which were sometimes a problem before switching to this strategy.

I see all the patients in normal consultation prior to commencing the CBT to explain the process and to gain an initial understanding of their problems and what they hope to gain from the process. I also perform a medical review at this consultation. Sometimes these patients require further medical work-up plus/minus medication before proceeding to CBT. Currently the only referral base I have is from within the general practice in which I work but my CBT sessions - 2 per week each of 3 or four patients - are booked weeks ahead so there is no ethical concern or difficulty in eliminating any medical issues which may be influencing the patient's presentation. I discuss any suggested medication options with the doctor who is the primary carer of the patient in the practice before proceeding.

Generally patients book in blocks of three appointments, each a week apart.

So in answer to your specific questions:

1) The $300 (average) is on top of the Medicare Rebate

2) I perform the CBT

3) I know of a number of psychologists in my area and there are also many non-psychologist "counsellors" but I do not know who performs CBT and I do not have knowledge of which of them obtain good outcomes for their patients. I have little need to refer for psychologist services and those of my general practice patients who have used other psychological services have generally asked for specific referral or been referred from other practitioners. I am in regular telephone contact with a couple of local psychiatrists who have been generous with their time and advice when needed.

4) I have not done formal training in CBT. My most significant learning came from a lay counsellor called Christopher Greene whom I met when working in far north Queensland about fifteen years ago. My stimulus was the frustration I felt at not being of any use to the depressed patients who were presenting to my general practice at the time. Christopher was widely read and used techniques derived from neurolinguistic programming (NLP) and cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT). He had had spectacular success with a number of patients with the so-called "allergy to the twentieth century" using these techniques.

After his chance but extraordinarily successful encounter with one of my patients, a desperate young woman whose baby had died, I invited Christopher to take a room in the practice and referred patients to him. As we were close friends at the time I often discussed his strategy with particular patients. I was impressed with the results he achieved with these patients. Since that time I have read widely and attended a number of short courses at different times in the intervening years. In the ten years that I have been in my present location, I have maintained a case load of 2-3 patients per week and gradually honed my skills. I did the Sphere course in 2004 which I found very useful. I am planning to take the Diploma in Mental Health Sciences at Monash, probably starting in 2008 - I have studies in skin cancer medicine on the go at the moment.

I use a proactive style which I think works quite well in the brief encounter model available in general practice. One of the basic tenets of CBT is to challenge previously fixed perceptions which patients hold about themselves and about events, especially those which they find traumatic. One thing it is not is "rentafriend". It is often confronting. Nevertheless it can be liberating for patients to discover that the negative long-held view they have had about themselves is a myth they can give away and that they can take control of their lives in ways they didn't think possible.

5) I have a number of texts on NLP and CBT but not one which stands out particularly. I have found it worthwhile to read a range of different authors, incorporating just those ideas which I could make use of with my patients. The key factor has been practice - regularly taking on patients and working their issues through with them. Some of the best moments of my medical career have come from seeing patients recover their lives through psychological medicine.

Alex


Dr Alexander G Bennett
Pomona Qld 4568
Australia

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



On 12/05/2006, at 8:25 AM, Dr Hugh Nelson wrote:

Alex
please tell us more about how to organise the CBT.
Is the $300 on top of medicare rebates.
Do you do the CBT or use a psychologist.
How do you ensure the psychologist is one who gets effective outcomes.
What do you do if the psychologist just operates as "rentafriend" and there is no effective outcome for the patients.
Did you do some specific training in CBT yourself.
Do you recommend any good books.

Hugh.

Alexander Bennett wrote:
Depends who you talk to and what kind of patients you see. Agree with KL doc if all he sees are psychotic patients; sounds like he is too busy making his millions to be fussed with patient outcomes. What kind of psychiatry do you deliver to 30-40 patients per day? Definitely not true for patients who do not have a thinking disorder and who come to CBT. I can point you at any number of patients whose lives have improved immeasurably with CBT. In my practice the cost is $300 over 6 weeks - hardly a fortune and much cheaper than divorce or decompensation.

Alex


Dr Alexander G Bennett
Pomona Qld 4568
Australia

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



On 28/04/2006, at 3:42 PM, David de Bhál wrote:

But that is all psychiatry talk. Does not exist in ICD-9 and have not
checked ICD-10.

Fasciniating to meet a pure private practitioner psychiatrist in KL and sees lots of high profile patients. He sees 30 to 40 patients per day. Very few GP referrals.Totally chemically focused but quite proprietary about his 'cures'. Says that psychotherapy is pure bunkum. I don’t think there are any talking cures unless you have heaps of money and then that is probably the
problem in itself.

He also does his own EHRs but it is on a local server with no security.
Interesting.

David de Bhál
www.v-practice.com


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:gpcg_talk- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Ian Cheong
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 6:19 AM
To: General Practice Computing Group Talk
Subject: Bordeline personality disorder was Re: [GPCG_TALK] Clinicalsoftware
recommendations

At 5:24 pm +1000 27/4/06, ash wrote:
Oliver wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David de Bhál
Sent: Thursday, 27 April 2006 4:34 PM

And WTF is "borderline personality disorder"?
Is it akin to borderline pregnancy or
borderline senility or borderline?

I think that it may have been invented since
you and I graduated.  I wonder what the label
used to be for people who behaved in these ways.

sociopath i believe (or psychopath was the less demure expression)


Label first introduced officially in 1980 DSMIII.

Definitely not sociopath. Perhaps "suicidal",
"non-coper", "pain in the ...". I recall when I
was a student they had the label of "too hard to
deal with" from psych registrars.

If you want to help these people, you could read:

Marsha Linehan on "dialectic behaviour therapy"
(a newish term not on the cover!)
http://tinyurl.com/l6kle

Russel Meares on "self psychology"
http://tinyurl.com/jj9cn

And remember that a large number of "borderline"
patients have suffered significant childhood
trauma (sexual/physical/emotional).

Also search for "borderline" on this page, which
is a fabulous site for complete exploration of
trauma, including full text of all major research
papers:
http://www.trauma-pages.com/pg4.htm

Major issues include:
* boundaries
* trust
* control

So attaching a label and not telling them about
it is a serious problem, which helps perpetuate
their aberrant behaviour.

"Borderline" patients are a long-term project
that can be helped towards cure. I have a couple
of them who have eventually been relabelled
correctly as "dissociative" rather than
"borderline" and are moving towards cure after a
long trail of different psychiatrists over
decades who didn't manage to help them. It seems
they often fall over at "...that was a long time
ago...get over it...."



Ian.

--Dr Ian R Cheong, BMedSc, FRACGP, GradDipCompSc, MBA(Exec)
Health Informatics Consultant, Brisbane, Australia
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(for urgent matters, please send a copy to my
practice email as well:
[EMAIL PROTECTED])

PRIVACY NOTE
I am happy for others to forward on email sent by me to public email lists.
Please ask my permission first if you wish to
forward private email to other parties.
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

--No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.5.0/325 - Release Date: 4/26/2006


--No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.5.0/325 - Release Date: 4/26/2006



_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

Reply via email to