|
Liz
The interview for this piece was quite some months ago. I believe that a
sub editor has taken a comment I made about the likelihood of all players
using a given standard as being unlikely and stuck it in here. My comment was
made in the context of describing the current non-use of the current Australian
Standard for Pathology Results transfer and how so few Path Labs actually use
it.
I believe that I speak generally on behalf of all of the main stream
clinical and front desk software houses when I say that all I have spoken to
about standards are very keen for their introduction - with the obvious proviso
that who ever made then, actually knew what they were doing. No one wants to
follow the adoption of a "standard" that is wrong for the task at hand.
Andrew
Dr. Andrew Magennis
M.B.,B.S. B.Sc (Hons) Dip. R.A.C.O.G. Medical Director Health Communication Network Contact
Work Tel: 03 9810 4510 Work Fax: 03 9819 3263 Mobile: 0417 135 302 Home Fax: 03 9882 3251 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: www.hcn.com.au
|
_______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
