On Tuesday 16 May 2006 07:41, Tim Churches wrote: > > Minus the patented and mostly undisclosed / undocumented core features, > > e.g. the authentication bits / cryptography etc. > > .Net is a poorly implemented good idea > > The opinion of those who have really used .NET and delved into its > internals seems to be is that it is actually rather well designed and > rather well implemented. Witness the fact that IronPython, which is
With "poorly implemented good idea" I was referring to the fact that they keep essential parts proprietary (= locking competitive implementations / other platforms effectively out) in a system that *could* be close to ideal. Horst _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
