I would have thought the error mentioned by Christopher may relate to
the handling of application variables in the client memory space.
Another example I recall - At one stage in MD2 there was a neat way of
changing the identity of the logged on doctor - if you logged in as Dr A
and printed a batch of stored scripts, and the list included some
scripts previously entered by Dr B (B's surname had to be alphabetically
greater than A's for this bug to operate), then from that time on the
program behaved as though Dr B was logged in even though Dr. A didn't
have a valid password for Dr.B.
This was fixed I think but it leaves in doubt the validity of any
progress notes written before the fix.

Tony


Peter Machell wrote:
> On 24/05/2006, at 8:43 PM, Christopher Wurm wrote:
> 
>> I would have presumed no professional software package could allow
>> such an error. How on earth did this get through ? Do we have a
>> guarantee it won't happen in MD3. If that could recur, I'd like to
>> make a strong case for using something else - in fact almost Anything
>> else!
> 
> You've been spoiled by Genie. Errors like this are common in MD2 which
> was never designed for network access, and requires constant management
> to keep data pollution to a minimum. Unfortunately the file repair is
> the only way to fix this sort of thing but is itself the most common
> cause of this sort of issue.
> 
> MD3 is much better already and improving rapidly, but the conversion is
> not trivial - in fact converting to Genie or Best Practice is more
> reliable.
> 
> Peter.
> _______________________________________________
> Gpcg_talk mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

Reply via email to