[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > if you had a process (running Linux? Windows?) which polls the > directory and can send files either GPG-email (to Horst, Alex > Bennett, and me ;-) or GPG-over-HTTP (i.e. to MO clients), and > generates ACKs in the format you want to feed back into the legacy > database, plus a nice web interface to adminster, and check message > status, etc., would you be (willing to consider) using it? >
Ian of course. I had a go at getting wagtail going but ran into windows issues with the crypto library iirc that were beyond my python level an order of magnitude. > Talking to MO clients depends on having access to their routing > database (presumably for a fee, which IMHO is fair enough) Andrew: > would you allow this? what if we cache the routing data (so we only > need to ask you once)? Instead, would you prefer the messages to go > through your servers? > > Ian _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing > list [email protected] > http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk > I think thats essentially what MO is doing for me now? I get a polling app with a nice solid firebird database which is looking like being able to route to argus without as well as within its own network and with Andrews Capricorn clients on the GP end, offering a point to point option outside MO's network with an open interface down the track?? Im not sure about how or if it routes to say a thunderbird email client or how that gets done or where the detailed specs are to do it etc. Horst have you interoperated with MO's network? I really havent absorbed the whole how MO works picture yet with the complex routing setup and proxies etc. I would like to support a fully open standards simple delivery option, and would be happy to try otherwise everything Ive said and done with messaging is contradicted from the last few years! Ive even considered throwing chunks of money at the project except a) i dont know about if I could get a result with the process b) nehta and the webservices direction c) i dont know what im doing yet with so many things. ive always stated Im happy to purchase proprietary software at my end to improve my productivity tracking and reporting. Ive also been solidly behind interoperability at the receiving end so any party can receive from any other (pay to send, not "pay to send and pay to receive"). And Horst I know that your pseudocode could form a solid basis, its just I dont have resources time or infrastructure to build test deploy something like that...mostly I need a solution thats mature now not tomorrow. referrers can be unforgiving if electronic downloads are not completely sound! There are lots of GPs and specialists out there who are technophobic and non computerised and while they may have internet and use that a bit, they have no clinical package to import a result into. What do they do with a .pit file as an email attachment? I know I can open it in wordpad and deal with it. I know its not a real biggie to dodgy up a python script to strip it and view it (but no time). I guess Argus for them offers a receive and view option at least. I dont think the lower end MO suite has a viewer facility (thats more the upper end). regards to all JD -- ================================================= dr john dooley mbbs frcpa aka "ron" _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
