At 1:57 pm +1000 1/7/06, David Guest wrote:
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature";
micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms080304070608010304010706"
David Guest wrote:
Oliver Frank wrote:
Which Y would that be?
After four months of deliberation they chose Argus.
I should add that in February 2006 the IT Department of the AHS invited
our Division to participate in the selection process but we declined.
The Divisional IT committee had spent six years on meetings, workshops
and think tanks none of which resulted in a decision. Our instructions
to them were we don't care what you choose, just *choose* something.
I can live with Y.
David
The only potential problem they could have would be with NeHTA, but
since State Health Depts are on the NeHTA Board, they should make
representations higher up the chain.
Ian.
--
Dr Ian R Cheong, BMedSc, FRACGP, GradDipCompSc, MBA(Exec)
Health Informatics Consultant, Brisbane, Australia
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(for urgent matters, please send a copy to my practice email as well:
[EMAIL PROTECTED])
PRIVACY NOTE
I am happy for others to forward on email sent by me to public email lists.
Please ask my permission first if you wish to forward private email
to other parties.
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
