Nah...whatever the result it would be handy in a legal setting. May be
a good reason not to do one! After all, it should be easy to argue that
it makes no difference (as it shouldn't) to the clinical decision. :-) G
Duncan Guy wrote:
Greg Markey wrote:
I guess this means (and I thought this when it was discussed
elsewhere) that this particular biochemical test (troponin) is of no
use clinically but may be handy legally. G
Provided you get the right result !
DG
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
