At 9:35 pm +1000 24/7/06, Ken Harvey wrote:
David Guest wrote:
I am interested in the legal basis for suppressing the report.
The "reasoning" given by Justice Greenwood for granting an
interlocutory injunction under s 52 of the Trade Practices Act 1974
(Cth) is publicly available at:
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/federal_ct/2006/868.html
The rationale of the judge is clear in the judgement. This case is
*not* about scientific truth, but about the delivery of "justice" in
a case littered with competing commercial interests and a due
regulatory process. The legal technicalities are open to ongoing
legal argument.
An independent examination of the facts and evidence by an
independent organisation might get a different response.
Ian.
--
Dr Ian R Cheong, BMedSc, FRACGP, GradDipCompSc, MBA(Exec)
Health Informatics Consultant, Brisbane, Australia
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(for urgent matters, please send a copy to my practice email as well:
[EMAIL PROTECTED])
PRIVACY NOTE
I am happy for others to forward on email sent by me to public email lists.
Please ask my permission first if you wish to forward private email
to other parties.
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
