Scroll to the next messages in the thread before you shoot from the hip next
time - you're starting to sound like me :)-

I did humbly apologise after being castigated (? Right word) by all and
sundry - was a good article
T


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Horst Herb
Sent: Wednesday, 26 July 2006 12:30 PM
To: General Practice Computing Group Talk
Subject: Re: [GPCG_TALK] Re: Row over regulation of alternative drugs
deepens

On Monday 24 July 2006 18:44, Thinus van Rensburg wrote:
> Ken, perhaps you would enlighten Horst about your affiliation and
> past/present roles within the ALP - he obviously doesn't know about it

Thinus, I think you still don't understand.
What the hell would Ken's part affiliation have to do with whether you read
a 
message of his, or what content his message might have?

For all I care, he can be a card carrying member of the hamster lovers from 
Mars.

Hell, even if somebody utterly evil and unreasonable (John Howard?) would
post 
something sensible, I still would at least read it - and if there is a
point, 
there is a point - regardless of what party he belongs to or how many
virgins 
he did or did not sacrifice last Sunday

Horst
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

Reply via email to