Wal Tracey wrote:
On 31/07/2006, at 10:24 PM, Richard Hosking wrote:
Richard
Most people would agree that a national deidentified dataset may be
valuable in the future.
I can see a big push looming from ADGP to drive their agendas using the
existing infrastructure of the Divisions
This is our opportunity to kill off the whole divisions apparatus. We
should studiously ignore them and all their projects.
Wal,
You see no value in Divisions, even in their local activities which most
try to make relevant to members? I admit that we have become less able
to be self-directive and respond to local needs and more bound to
objectives determined in Canberra, but I'm surprised you are so negative.
Yes, we mostly wonder about ADGP too, and we've been making our concerns
felt as best we can.
Greg
--
Greg Twyford
Information Management & Technology Program Officer
Canterbury Division of General Practice
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ph.: 02 9787 9033
Fax: 02 9787 9200
PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
***********************************************************************
The information contained in this e-mail and their attached files,
including replies and forwarded copies, are confidential and intended
solely for the addressee(s) and may be legally privileged or prohibited
from disclosure and unauthorised use. If you are not the intended
recipient, any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure,
modification, distribution and/or publication or any action taken or
omitted to be taken in reliance upon this message or its attachments is
prohibited.
All liability for viruses is excluded to the fullest extent permitted by
law.
***********************************************************************
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
