On Saturday 16 September 2006 20:16, Duncan Guy wrote:
> I need to access the local scanner (TWAIN) whilst using our EMR on a
> terminal server.  It is much easier to open the patients record, scan in
> their referral etc when they are at the desk rather than scanning and
> matching up later.
>
> It seems Citrix thin clients will allow this,
>
> Does anyone have experiences with CITRIX or running scanners like this?

While we find it a lot easier to batch scab a bundle of papers and afterwards 
match them to individual patients, you can do what you want by connecting 
your scanner via SANE and using a SANE-TWAIN bridge on the Windows computer / 
CITRIX terminal session (if you have Macs or Linux/BSD, you should be able to 
use SANE directly)

http://sane-project.org/ - you'll have to search that web site a bit for 
instructions how to run it on non-POSIX platforms and where to find the 
SANE-TWAIN bridge

SANE is network capable, that is you can address a scanner via network address 
instead of USB or SCSI interface - like addressing a printer via print 
server. In my practice, we can access any scanner in any room from any 
computer / terminal session just as we can access any printer

I quote from SANE's web site:
"""If you're familiar with TWAIN, you may wonder why there is a need for SANE. 
Simply put, TWAIN does not separate the user-interface from the driver of a 
device. This, unfortunately, makes it difficult, if not impossible, to 
provide network transparent access to image acquisition devices (which is 
useful if you have a LAN full of machines, but scanners connected to only one 
or two machines; it's obviously also useful for remote-controlled cameras and 
such). It also means that any particular TWAIN driver is pretty much married 
to a particular GUI API (be it Win32 or the Mac API). In contrast, SANE 
cleanly separates device controls from their representation in a 
user-interface. As a result, SANE has no difficulty supporting command-line 
driven interfaces or network-transparent scanning. For these reasons, it is 
unlikely that there will ever be a SANE backend that can talk to a TWAIN 
driver. The converse is no problem though: it is pretty straight forward to 
access SANE devices through a TWAIN source. """

Horst
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

Reply via email to