Strange
I found myself dayfreaming today about a similar project, only it would
be a business venture. I dont apologize for this - why should such a
project be altruistic?
I might be willing to put up some money, but not if "representatives" of
various organizations are involved. Their loyalties are divided - are
they for the business/venture or their organization?
R
Tony Eviston wrote:
Daydreaming......
A hard-to-please aussie GP is disillusioned with the available EHR
software choices.
He/she is not so worried about its cost, or even its functionality but
more about its closed architecture and the fact that half of the
programming effort seems to be dedicated to locking in users rather
than fixing bugs or creating creating an extensible platform.
The GP finds himself in a position to provide some seed funding for an
effort towards a more open alternative. Lets say $10,000 for arguments
sake.
Concerned about the fate of such efforts in the past he seeks advice
about a suitable development pathway from his I.T. literate friends.
As a conversation starter our GP explains that he had the following in
mind when he conceived the idea:
(1) that before proceeding to step two he wanted pledges of an
additional $40,000 from others of similar vision
(2) that a legal entity be set up in a suitable way to protect the
interests of the donors, but that the entity be not for profit from
the outset.
(3) that the directorate of this entity will comprise at least one of
each of the following: a practicing GP with demonstrated IT knowledge,
an invited medical-IT consultant, a representative of ADGP , a
representative of ACRRM, a representative of RACGP.
(4) that 12 months should pass until Step 5, during which time
extensive consultation will occur Australia wide involving any GPs who
wishes to make a submissions, and invited input from a wide range of
groups including pharmacy, allied health and other professional
organizations. Further donations will be solicited from individuals
and organizations during this phase
(5) that a detailed specification list and a proposed roadmap be
developed and costed over the ensuing 6 months with the assistance of
suitably qualified professional software project leader (paid).
At this point we have a grand plan and hopefully the interest of some
of the target audience. Decisions to be made now include
Does the project proceed?
What licence model?
Target platform(s)?
Does the project develop an entire application or just the core
components with a suitable licence to encourage others to add pieces
to it?
Core components, programming language and technologies.
Develop in Australia or India?
How to make the project sustainable?
Our GP does not anticipate that any actual coding will be done by
donors, the only acceptable donations will be dollars or time in
developing the social network around the project. As deliverables
appear there will be the opportunity for secondary use by those
wishing to develop, fork or otherwise use the available code.
All input welcome.
Tony Eviston
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
