Horst Herb wrote:
On Tuesday 19 September 2006 09:43, Andrew Cameron wrote:
I use
www.grc.com

Then follow links to Sheilds-up as a starting point. Check all service
ports.

And yes some ports may be open for intrusion detection if your firewall has
it.(like snapgears, but you can turn it off)

This does *not* test your firwall. All it does is list ports that can be seen as "open".

A system that interacts in any meaningful way with other systems via the net must have some ports visibly open, and that in itself is *not* a security risk. But that check can help to detect ports that have been left open unintentionally, so it is worthwhile.

A good firewall will help to police that traffic through open ports is legitimate - in order to test the firewall you need to stand *behind* it (not in front of it) and catch & report what comes through that shouldn't have - testing it from the outside is merely the first step you should perform before you connect your system to an untrusted network. After that, the real monitoring (constant, several times every day) begins - from within. *That's* the checking that is necessary

Horst,

you make some very clear points here, and you are very correct.

When I used Smoothwall it's logs were indeed checkable in the way you describe. I did check them from time to time, but the key is having the capacity to understand what the logs are telling you. Most end-users, including GPs, don't possess this skills, nor the time.

In large, security-conscious organisations, regular checking of firewall logs is standard practice, but I doubt that it is done elsewhere, except by highly-skilled users such as yourself.

What this means in terms of having 'real' security when using the Internet, and how it could be achieved for most practices, could be the substance of another debate.

The GPCG firewall guidelines go a long way towards aiding end-users, and have proved useful to me in convincing GPs that they need to do more to secure their access.

Greg

--
Greg Twyford
Information Management & Technology Program Officer
Canterbury Division of General Practice
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ph.: 02 9787 9033
Fax: 02 9787 9200

PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
***********************************************************************
The information contained in this e-mail and their attached files,
including replies and forwarded copies, are confidential and intended
solely for the addressee(s) and may be legally privileged or prohibited
from disclosure and unauthorised use. If you are not the intended
recipient, any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure,
modification, distribution and/or publication or any action taken or
omitted to be taken in reliance upon this message or its attachments is
prohibited.

All liability for viruses is excluded to the fullest extent permitted by
law.
***********************************************************************

_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

Reply via email to