Richard Hosking wrote:
> It is an interesting idea that medical knowledge should be "open source".
> Certainly clinical medicine is "open", though some areas of medicine are
> increasingly proprietary, such as pharmaceuticals and the processes
> underlying pathology.

Yes, very unfortunate trends. At the very least, the intellectual
property protection regimes for health-related technologies need to be
reformed, so that drug companies can, for example, only get patents on
important new drugs for 5 years instead of 14 years as they can now.

> The human genome has been patented.

No it hasn't been. It is freely available - you can download and explore
the whole lot of you like. Certain genes contained within the human
genome have been patented, but not the whole thing. And even then, those
patents are often limited in scope to specific applications of those
genes and those are often US-only patents (patents are not world-wide,
they need to be applied for and secured in each country for them to have
an effect in that country).

> I suppose in
> the old days if you were a witch doctor, it didnt make commercial sense
> to open your knowledge to everyone..

Indeed.

Tim C

Keeping medicines from the bloodstreams of the sick; food from the
bellies of the hungry; books from the hands of the uneducated;
technology from the underdeveloped; and putting advocates of freedom in
prisons. Intellectual property is to the 21st century what the slave
trade was to the 16th.

> Tim Churches wrote:
> 
>> Horst Herb wrote:
>>  
>>
>>> Yes I do. This is why I charge >= $200/hour, yet the farmhand I
>>> employ to fix my fences only gets $20/hour, or the lady doing the
>>> ironing only $18/hour
>>>   
>>
>> I'm a bit shocked that Horst doesn't do his own ironing...
>>
>>  
>>
> 
> Ironing is a bit of a mystery to me
> _______________________________________________
> Gpcg_talk mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
> 

_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

Reply via email to