Horst Herb wrote: > On Sunday 24 September 2006 17:47, Tim Churches wrote: >> OK. Does Ruby have a really high quality implementation on the .NET/Mono >> framework? How about Trolltech QT bindings? > > Ruby-QT is already in a mature state. There is even a book about it in > te "Ptagmatic Programmers" series: > http://www.pragmaticprogrammer.com/titles/ctrubyqt/ > > wxRuby is in the making too, but nowhere near as mature as wxPython (yet). > And > there is always Ruby/GTK as well as Ruby-Mozilla integration to make use of > the Mozilla widgets > > While I find .NET a dangerous track to follow (because of so many proprietary > *patended* functionalities e.g. regarding authentication), there is indeed an > implementation of Ruby .NET, though not as mature as IronPython: > http://plas.fit.qut.edu.au/Ruby.NET/ > > As most FOSS developers, I do it mostly to scratch my own itch. As such, .NET > will never enter my own equation
OK, fair enough, but please don't get angry if some of us want to second-guess your technological opinions, because we are discussing something to potentially scratch many people's itch, not just yours. Tim C _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
