Horst Herb wrote:
> On Monday 25 September 2006 18:34, Tim Churches wrote:
>> Although OSCAR is itself another example of a working open source EMR
>> developed by paid, professional developers (in an academic setting,
>> what's more).
> 
> David Chan developed the first version entirely without funding if I remember 
> right (I might be mixing things up). But he got funding for professional 
> programmers once he had something to show

I thought he wrote the first version himself using Advanced Revelation
(a marvellous but now sadly defunct PICK-derivative for MS-DOS), and
then had it professionally re-written for the Web.

> I lived and worked with them for a week - none of them is in for it just for 
> the money. All his professional programmers (at least the ones I had the 
> pleasure to meet) are idealists who work for a lot less than they are worth.

Sure, but nor are they volunteers working in their spare time - that was
my point.

Tim C

_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

Reply via email to