Tim Churches wrote: > I've done my duty in pointing out alternatives, but clearly you're all > convinced,
I'm not convinced yet. I would rather see a rock solid, guaranteed-backward-compatible-forever database schema. No matter if we have to add fields later as long as it doesn't interfere with the function of tomorrow's legacy applications. I don't mind if others want to go down the RoR or whatever object oriented route but please don't make it compulsory. Tony _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
