My demo is 1.34 build 1.12     Think I have the honour of being the first to
try it  :-)

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Andrew Cameron
Sent: Wednesday, 11 October 2006 10:17 PM
To: 'General Practice Computing Group Talk'
Subject: RE: [GPCG_TALK] Practix slow over WAN link

 its blue and green.
Ver1.32 build 1.31

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dr John Van Dyck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, 11 October 2006 8:31 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'General Practice Computing Group Talk'
> Subject: RE: [GPCG_TALK] Practix slow over WAN link
>
> Are you running the updated (blue, not green/brown) yet Andrew?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Andrew Cameron
> Sent: Tuesday, 10 October 2006 10:15 PM
> To: 'General Practice Computing Group Talk'
> Subject: RE: [GPCG_TALK] Practix slow over WAN link
>
> Well an update is due...
> IBA Support dialling in last week after hours and suddenly
> the remote site is more usable.
> Not sure what they did but it is definitley quicker and the
> main server is doing considerably less work.
> We were thinking after running some performance monitoring
> that the main server would need its 2nd xeon cpu and another
> 2 gig of ram as it was sitting on 20-35% cpu and the disk
> queue length was getting up there at 2-3.
>
> But after IBA has tweaked things it is back to an acceptable 2-5% cpu.
>
> Love to know what they did.
>
> So maybe Dr John Van Dyck has nothing to worry about next
> year after all :)
>
> Andrew C.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gpcg_talk mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
>


_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

Reply via email to