On 08/11/2006, at 11:32 AM, Chris Tansell wrote:

C: The software needs to be backwards-compatible to the Commodore 64 (I
think some of them are still using them?!??)

If only. The CBM machines were a lot more reliable than a Wintel box.

Peter.
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

Reply via email to