I cant see that anyone will be able to make money out of what is essentially a secure E mail client - there are a million possible alternatives. Who stands to gain from the use of Argus? Probably Govt most - they should consider paying what they should have paid at the start for the IP and make it open to everyone. I cant any possible reason for them not to make the software freely available to all - is it because neither party has the right to do so without the other's agreement?

Path and radiology providers have a commercial interest in providing good service to their customers - as a GP they all seem pretty good to me. I dont particularly care how the result is delivered - I am happy with paper if there is no other alternative . In fact (just quietly) I find paper more efficient as far as my time is concerned as we still have hybrid paper/electronic records. Of course it is much more labour intensive as far as front desk staff are concerned but then I am not paying for that :) Having used MD2 in a completely electronic practice I found the result handling quite onerous (admittedly checking other people's results). The bottom line is that I am personally happy with the status quo and would not be keen to pay any significant amount for E mail support

R
John Mackenzie wrote:

I (and I suspect Horst) would like an *unsupported* no-registration version, and would be willing to pay you by the hour if (for some reason) we needed help getting it to work. IMHO you should target this version to Linux with no graphical installer, this will stop the "Where's the Any Key?" brigade from downloading it and then throwing a tantrum when they don't get their free support on a silver platter. Yes this means your userbase becomes slightly larger than your client database, by about 4 users. You add add our names and e-mails from the archives of this list, if you like ;-) Ian

But an Argus version which doesn't require any
registration code allows pathology and radiology
companies to use Argus free, and denies Argus
their proposed source of revenue.
John Mac
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

Reply via email to