Duncan Guy wrote: > In a business environment our lawyers reckon its a good idea. > > When I am using my "work" email I have the following > > "Unless otherwise indicated the information contained in this message > is privileged, confidential and intended for the use of the recipient > named above. Any unauthorised use of the contents is expressly > prohibited. As some parts of this e-mail may be protected by > copyright and trademark, all rights are reserved for the copyright or > trademark owner. If the reader of this message is not the intended > recipient (or the employee or agent responsible for delivery to the > intended person), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > distribution, or copying of this communication is prohibited. > If you have received this communication or attachment(s) in error, > please reply to the sender from which you received it and delete this > message in its entirety." While this is all well and good the recipient can do what she likes with the information. She may be subject to defamation laws but not breach of privacy.
> Feel free to use this as part of your email signature and save the cost, > > It also reminds me that emails are a legal document and are tendered > in court as evidence (we recently had a case - business issue - where > an email saved a lot of $$ and was accepted as evidence) > > Oh, I should add a disclaimer - this disclaimer is free to use by > anyone but if the stuff hits the fan dont blame me, Which is why these are inappropriate on posting to email lists. David _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
