On Monday 27 November 2006 14:36, Greg Twyford wrote: > If its good security practice [well consistency anyway] or keeping the > system ticking over, HIC chose the latter, god bless 'em. > > All certificate-based systems seem to suffer the Achilles Heel of > certificate expiry and renewal. HeSA advises users their certificate is > due for renewal, but the E-mail to practices about from HIC, about its > own, meant very little to most practices, so there was a rush at the > death, that proved unnecessary anyway.
Ah, the idiocy of third party generated keys, never ceases to cause problems. They brought it onto themselves, now let them suffer the consequences. If practices were allowed to generate their own X.509 keys and simply submit them for certification, it would be MUCH easier in the long run to do it properly instead of the Mickey Mouse parody of a public key infrastructire we have now Horst _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
