Ross Davey wrote: 
> Horst
> You are mistaken in this statement.
>
> SINCE AUGUST 7TH, Argus *has* been available as the latest, live
> version as open source as announced on this list by Andrew Shrosbree.
> (see below)  It *is* read-only and *is* on the same source tree as
> used by our developers.
>
> (We believe that you may have been looking at the very old Health
> Openware Foundation site where Argus source was first published).
>
> We did make a number of announcements on this list about the
> availability of Argus source on our Subversion site but had not got
> HOWF to modify its site and perhaps link to our site.  Since then we
> have added the README and licence files that Tim Churches suggested to
> explain the licence conditions better.
This is excellent news Ross.

> With regard to your concerns about the registration process, I have
> explained the rationale for this on a number of occasions.  However we
> have started discussions here now about your suggestions for allowing
> 'forking' of the code, and we will seriously consider that so that
> those who object to registration might be able to remove that to
> create a 'non-ArgusConnect' version.

I don't think that's Argus' responsibility, if people have the code and
want to remove the registration requirement that's up to them.

Argus is a great product and now that it's GPLed it would be hard to
find a better alternative. The real commercial value in signing up for
ArgusConnect is for their LDAP server. There are clearly major
commercial costs in maintaining this but massive benefits for its users
and they should pay for this facility. This is what I see as the benefit
for going through the Argus registration process. The value of
ArgusConnect will increase as the network effect kicks in and if they
make a lot of money out of that I will be very pleased for them.

David

P.S. Ross, can you get the ArgusConnect web site back up? It's hard to
enthuse others when it's broken.









_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

Reply via email to