Fee Goswell wrote:
So now the Hunter has an awful problem - one didnt talk to the other - we
will have 130 practices with Medical-Objects and over 200 specialists
with
Argus!!
I cannot imagine that those 200 odd specialists will want to fork out
$450
each just to receive or send correspondence to GP's, which is what
they have
all shown interest in.
Something has to give.......
What do you do when contracts have been signed though?!
fee
Felicity, I would greastly appreaciate your posting this to the Nat Div
list as I am not a participant.
Fee
If this eventuates, Hunter doctors can be assured that consistent with
our continual public support of 'open' messaging and 'interoperability',
Argus will cooperate with Medical Objects to implement a means of
passing messages between our clients. ie MO clients may send to Argus
clients and Argus clients may send to MO clients. However this will be
on two conditions:
1) That any cost of implementing and maintaining such a link will be
borne by HUDGP.
and
2) that no specialist or any other clients using Argus and wishing to
send to a MO client will incur any resulting cost either as a
transaction cost, or setup cost.
MO and ArgusConnect have started discussions on the technical
implementation of this. Once MO or HUDGP provide some assurances on this
issue we can forge ahead.
regards
ross Davey
-------------------------------
Ross Davey
CEO
ArgusConnect Pty Ltd
Ph: 03 5335 2220
Mob: 0417 548608
Web: www.argusconnect.com.au
-------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
