If you doing a review of tyhe capabilities of clinical messaging clients
then why cant you say which was better?
Surely this is not prevented by confidentiality?
If so, arguably you should not have entered into such an agreement -
whats the point?
Wouldnt the vendor have agreed to allow publishing of results if you
simply threaten to walk away?
R
Chris Scott wrote:
Dear All,
In the last two days there have been discussions on this list about
HUDGP's direction in relation to clinical messaging.
The HUDGP is currently finalising a review of the functionality of
clinical messaging applications and how these systems might serve our
community in the future. At this point the HUDGP is not in a position
to make a statement. Additionally in order for the HUDGP to evaluate
systems, clinical messaging vendors have provided confidential
information and intellectual property (IP) to the Division. Some
vendors have specifically prohibited the HUDGP from passing on
confidential information and IP to any other party, thus we cannot
provide details of our findings as some have requested.
Clinical messaging vendors have expended a great amount of time and
effort in working with the HUDGP and we are very grateful to them. It
is clear that the energy being directed by the vendors to clinical
messaging in this country is a positive sign for the future.
Chris.
Chris Scott
Chief Information Officer
Hunter Urban Division of General Practice
Tel: 02 4925 2259
Mobile: 0413 945 564
Help Desk: 02 4929 1000
http://www.hudgp.org.au <blocked::http://www.hudgp.org.au/>
NOTICE - This message (including any attached files) is intended only for the use of the addressee named above and may contain privileged and confidential information.
If you are not the intended recipient of this message you must not disseminate, copy or take any action based upon it. If you received this message in error please notify the Hunter Urban Division of General Practice immediately (+61 2 4925 2259).
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except
where the sender specifically states them to be the views of the Hunter Urban
Division of General Practice.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
