On Wednesday 06 December 2006 23:59, Ian Haywood wrote: > > Ross Davey wrote: > > > If the participants would like, I would be pleased to start the ball > > > rolling by preparing a short discussion paper on the different options > > > for implementing digital signing. This would cover issues of whether > > > the entire HL7 message is signed, whether the atomised data is signed, > > > whether the individual OBX segments are signed, whether the facsimile > > > of the document is separately signed, whether the signing should be > > > agnostic to wvwn whether the payload is HL7 or other messaging formats > > > etc etc. > > > This should encourage some lively debate and hopefully give us some > > > rich food for thought.. > > The HL7 standards already spell out exactly how messages should be..... Wait a sec. I just realised who I'm replying to. It's impossible you would not know this, which makes you proposal to define a new standard even more confusing.
Ian
pgpyWfkUuKW89.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
