Tom Bowden wrote: > > Would it be possible for the learned members of this list to give some > useful feedback on all of the NEHTA documents, if necessary roping in > colleagues who have specific domain expertise to help. Clearly, if we > let these documents go through unchallenged, and they are as David > says arcane and irrelevant, then they will form further roadblocks to > progress and we will have no-one but ourselves to blame. On the other > hand, David may be entirely wrong and NEHTA may indeed have ushered > in a new dawn for Australian health IT? > > Any views on the above? Take a look at this on > http://aushealthit.blogspot.com > I think the proposed standards should be both implementable and implemented. It's hard to tell if the former is true without doing the latter. The process for achieving the latter has never, to my knowledge, been espoused.
I'd be interested in your assessment from the other side, Tom, and suggest that you blog it. Bear in mind Liz's comments though. Length isn't important, conciseness is. HTH. David -- I'd just like to say that Medical Director is the bestest software ever. _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
