I bring to your attention Note C of this essay
http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/vista_cost.html

which is copied below in lieu of the usual signature file from fortune

Note C: In order for content to be displayed to users, it has to be copied 
numerous times. For example if you're reading this document on the web then 
it's been copied from the web server's disk drive to server memory, copied to 
the server's network buffers, copied across the Internet, copied to your PC's 
network buffers, copied into main memory, copied to your browser's disk 
cache, copied to the browser's rendering engine, copied to the render/screen 
cache, and finally copied to your screen. If you've printed it out to read, 
several further rounds of copying have occurred. Windows Vista's content 
protection (and DRM in general) assume that all of this copying can occur 
without any copying actually occurring, since the whole intent of DRM is to 
prevent copying. If you're not versed in DRM doublethink this concept gets 
quite tricky to explain, but in terms of quantum mechanics the content enters 
a superposition of simultaneously copied and uncopied states until a user 
collapses its wave function by observing the content (in physics this is 
called quantum indeterminacy or the observer's paradox). Depending on whether 
you follow the Copenhagen or many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics, 
things then either get weird or very weird. So in order for Windows Vista's 
content protection to work, it has to be able to violate the laws of physics 
and create numerous copies that are simultaneously not copies.

(Someone has pointed out that Microsoft is trying to implement a quantum 
encryption channel in software that attempts to make premium content non- 
observable, detecting problem states and discontinuing transmission if any 
are observed).
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

Reply via email to