Elizabeth, What is a nix derivative?
And what does it have to do with SPAM blocking Peter -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Elizabeth Dodd Sent: Saturday, 24 March 2007 6:33 PM To: General Practice Computing Group Talk Subject: Re: [GPCG_TALK] Messaging Responsibilities - HL7 workshop outcomes. On Saturday 24 March 2007 18:24, Peter MacIsaac wrote: > Please note: due to increasing problems with SPAM, I am using SPAM > ARREST - http://www.spamarrest.com/affl?4034505 - a relatively > inexpensive service which extends my current email service and prevents > automated SPAM attacks by checking with email senders that they are > bonefide people needing to communicate with me. If you are not already in > my address book and reply to this, you may receive a confirmation email > asking you to respond. Once you answer, the email is on the way and will > receive my attention. I am evaluating this service and would appreciate > any feedback on it. I also have information on the corporate configuration > of the service. and if you are paying for brownlisting then why? brownlisting can be done for *Nix with *Nix derivatives - as usual -- Velilind's Laws of Experimentation: (1) If reproducibility may be a problem, conduct the test only once. (2) If a straight line fit is required, obtain only two data points. _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk -- Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.18.13/725 - Release Date: 17/03/2007 12:33 PM -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.17/732 - Release Date: 24/03/2007 4:36 PM _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
